Iraq vs Norway: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Iraq
0.2874 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
0.3153 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Iraq rank
120th
Norway rank
118th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Iraq
  • Norway
00.250.50.7511.2196119922023

How they compare

Norway currently reports 0.3153 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.2874 1000 USD per square kilometre in Iraq, a difference of 0.0279 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Norway's figure about 1.1 times Iraq's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Norway ahead.

Iraq ranks 120th and Norway ranks 118th of 139 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Iraq averaged higher in 3 and Norway in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iraq Norway Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0131 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9987 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9856 1000 USD per square kilometre Norway
1970s 0.0606 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6443 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5837 1000 USD per square kilometre Norway
1980s 0.1657 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4744 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3087 1000 USD per square kilometre Norway
1990s 0.2424 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.488 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2456 1000 USD per square kilometre Norway
2000s 0.7607 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3609 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3998 1000 USD per square kilometre Iraq
2010s 0.4486 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3249 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1237 1000 USD per square kilometre Iraq
2020s 0.5146 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.357 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1576 1000 USD per square kilometre Iraq

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Iraq or Norway?
Norway, at 0.3153 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.2874 1000 USD per square kilometre in Iraq as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Iraq and Norway?
0.0279 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Norway?
51 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iraq and Norway rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Iraq ranks 120th and Norway ranks 118th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iraq vs Norway: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/iraq/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/iraq/norway/">Iraq vs Norway: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.