India vs Zambia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

India
4.08 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
4.3 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
India rank
39th
Zambia rank
38th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • India
  • Zambia
01234196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 4.3 1000 USD per square kilometre against 4.08 1000 USD per square kilometre in India, a difference of 0.22 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times India's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1961 it was India ahead.

India ranks 39th and Zambia ranks 38th of 139 countries.

India has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade India Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4049 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1663 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2386 1000 USD per square kilometre India
1970s 0.699 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.231 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.468 1000 USD per square kilometre India
1980s 1 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3868 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6152 1000 USD per square kilometre India
1990s 1.18 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6283 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5533 1000 USD per square kilometre India
2000s 2.32 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.09 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.23 1000 USD per square kilometre India
2010s 3.16 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.01 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.15 1000 USD per square kilometre India
2020s 3.75 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.73 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0159 1000 USD per square kilometre India

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), India or Zambia?
Zambia, at 4.3 1000 USD per square kilometre against 4.08 1000 USD per square kilometre in India as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between India and Zambia?
0.22 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do India and Zambia rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
India ranks 39th and Zambia ranks 38th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

India vs Zambia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/india/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/india/zambia/">India vs Zambia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.