Iceland vs Namibia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Iceland
0.0657 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.0758 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
135th
Namibia rank
133rd

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Iceland
  • Namibia
0.050.10.150.2196119922023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.0758 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0657 1000 USD per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0.0101 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.2 times Iceland's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 135th and Namibia ranks 133rd of 139 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 6 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0735 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0315 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.042 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland
1970s 0.0768 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0351 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0417 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 0.1183 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0395 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0789 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 0.0928 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0442 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0487 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 0.1015 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.06 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0415 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 0.0777 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0706 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0071 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 0.0635 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0758 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0122 1000 USD per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Iceland or Namibia?
Namibia, at 0.0758 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0657 1000 USD per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Iceland and Namibia?
0.0101 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Namibia rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Iceland ranks 135th and Namibia ranks 133rd of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Namibia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/iceland/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/iceland/namibia/">Iceland vs Namibia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.