Hungary vs Niger: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Hungary
0.6107 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Niger
0.599 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Hungary rank
102nd
Niger rank
103rd

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Hungary
  • Niger
02468196119922023

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 0.6107 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.599 1000 USD per square kilometre in Niger, a difference of 0.0117 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hungary ahead.

Hungary ranks 102nd and Niger ranks 103rd of 139 countries.

Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Niger Difference Ahead
1960s 6.03 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0437 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.99 1000 USD per square kilometre Hungary
1970s 4.8 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0499 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.75 1000 USD per square kilometre Hungary
1980s 4.05 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0561 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.99 1000 USD per square kilometre Hungary
1990s 3.39 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0463 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.34 1000 USD per square kilometre Hungary
2000s 2.05 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0593 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.99 1000 USD per square kilometre Hungary
2010s 1.34 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1583 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.18 1000 USD per square kilometre Hungary
2020s 0.6684 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4981 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1703 1000 USD per square kilometre Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Hungary or Niger?
Hungary, at 0.6107 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.599 1000 USD per square kilometre in Niger as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Hungary and Niger?
0.0117 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Niger?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Hungary and Niger rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Hungary ranks 102nd and Niger ranks 103rd of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hungary vs Niger: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/hungary/niger/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/hungary/niger/">Hungary vs Niger: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.