Ghana vs Malawi: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Ghana
48.22 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi
57.03 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Ghana rank
2nd
Malawi rank
1st

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Ghana
  • Malawi
0204060196119922023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 57.03 1000 USD per square kilometre against 48.22 1000 USD per square kilometre in Ghana, a difference of 8.81 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.2 times Ghana's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ghana ahead.

Ghana ranks 2nd and Malawi ranks 1st of 139 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 4 and Malawi in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ghana Malawi Difference Ahead
1960s 5.3 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8297 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.47 1000 USD per square kilometre Ghana
1970s 5.21 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.76 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.45 1000 USD per square kilometre Ghana
1980s 5.95 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.24 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.71 1000 USD per square kilometre Ghana
1990s 13.55 1000 USD per square kilometre 7.47 1000 USD per square kilometre 6.08 1000 USD per square kilometre Ghana
2000s 21.01 1000 USD per square kilometre 21.29 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2756 1000 USD per square kilometre Malawi
2010s 32.73 1000 USD per square kilometre 39.59 1000 USD per square kilometre 6.86 1000 USD per square kilometre Malawi
2020s 46.2 1000 USD per square kilometre 55.33 1000 USD per square kilometre 9.13 1000 USD per square kilometre Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Ghana or Malawi?
Malawi, at 57.03 1000 USD per square kilometre against 48.22 1000 USD per square kilometre in Ghana as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Ghana and Malawi?
8.81 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Malawi?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ghana and Malawi rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Ghana ranks 2nd and Malawi ranks 1st of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ghana vs Malawi: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/ghana/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/ghana/malawi/">Ghana vs Malawi: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.