Germany vs Samoa: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Germany
6.28 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Samoa
5.9 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Germany rank
28th
Samoa rank
30th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Germany
  • Samoa
05101520196119922023

How they compare

Germany currently reports 6.28 1000 USD per square kilometre against 5.9 1000 USD per square kilometre in Samoa, a difference of 0.38 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Germany's figure about 1.1 times Samoa's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Germany ahead.

Germany ranks 28th and Samoa ranks 30th of 139 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Germany averaged higher in 4 and Samoa in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Germany Samoa Difference Ahead
1960s 17.77 1000 USD per square kilometre 7.09 1000 USD per square kilometre 10.68 1000 USD per square kilometre Germany
1970s 12.71 1000 USD per square kilometre 9.22 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.49 1000 USD per square kilometre Germany
1980s 9.83 1000 USD per square kilometre 11.66 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.83 1000 USD per square kilometre Samoa
1990s 6.24 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.17 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.07 1000 USD per square kilometre Germany
2000s 6.24 1000 USD per square kilometre 6.56 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3179 1000 USD per square kilometre Samoa
2010s 5.76 1000 USD per square kilometre 9.49 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.72 1000 USD per square kilometre Samoa
2020s 6.13 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.88 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2549 1000 USD per square kilometre Germany

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Germany or Samoa?
Germany, at 6.28 1000 USD per square kilometre against 5.9 1000 USD per square kilometre in Samoa as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Germany and Samoa?
0.38 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Germany ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Samoa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Germany and Samoa rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Germany ranks 28th and Samoa ranks 30th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Germany vs Samoa: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/germany/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/germany/samoa/">Germany vs Samoa: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.