How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Slovenia?

30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Georgia vs Slovenia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Georgia

0.862 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Slovenia

0.8431 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Georgia rank

87th

Slovenia rank

89th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Georgia
Slovenia

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 0.862 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.8431 1000 USD per square kilometre in Slovenia, a difference of 0.0189 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Slovenia ahead.

Georgia ranks 87th and Slovenia ranks 89th of 139 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Georgia	Slovenia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	1.52 1000 USD per square kilometre	2.31 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.7896 1000 USD per square kilometre	Slovenia
2000s	1.41 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.68 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.2699 1000 USD per square kilometre	Slovenia
2010s	1.01 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.02 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0058 1000 USD per square kilometre	Slovenia
2020s	0.9169 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.8628 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0542 1000 USD per square kilometre	Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Georgia or Slovenia?: Georgia, at 0.862 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.8431 1000 USD per square kilometre in Slovenia as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Georgia and Slovenia?: 0.0189 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Slovenia?: 30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Georgia and Slovenia rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Georgia ranks 87th and Slovenia ranks 89th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Slovenia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/georgia/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/georgia/slovenia/">Georgia vs Slovenia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.