Gambia vs Tunisia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Gambia
0.7288 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
0.6876 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia rank
97th
Tunisia rank
99th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Gambia
  • Tunisia
00.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 0.7288 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.6876 1000 USD per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 0.0412 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Gambia's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Gambia ahead.

Gambia ranks 97th and Tunisia ranks 99th of 139 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 5 and Tunisia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.419 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0893 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3296 1000 USD per square kilometre Gambia
1970s 0.4817 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1442 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3375 1000 USD per square kilometre Gambia
1980s 0.3586 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2382 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1204 1000 USD per square kilometre Gambia
1990s 0.3867 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.388 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0013 1000 USD per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 0.474 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5246 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0507 1000 USD per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 0.678 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6304 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0476 1000 USD per square kilometre Gambia
2020s 0.7288 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6822 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0465 1000 USD per square kilometre Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Gambia or Tunisia?
Gambia, at 0.7288 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.6876 1000 USD per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Gambia and Tunisia?
0.0412 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Tunisia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Gambia and Tunisia rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Gambia ranks 97th and Tunisia ranks 99th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs Tunisia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/gambia-the/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/gambia-the/tunisia/">Gambia vs Tunisia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.