Fiji vs Mauritius: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Fiji
6.9 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
7.48 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Fiji rank
25th
Mauritius rank
22nd

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Fiji
  • Mauritius
02468196119922023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 7.48 1000 USD per square kilometre against 6.9 1000 USD per square kilometre in Fiji, a difference of 0.58 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Fiji's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Fiji ahead.

Fiji ranks 25th and Mauritius ranks 22nd of 139 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Fiji Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 4.33 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.35 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.98 1000 USD per square kilometre Fiji
1970s 1.45 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.37 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.91 1000 USD per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 1.53 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.67 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.15 1000 USD per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 1.58 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.42 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.84 1000 USD per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 4.45 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.89 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4391 1000 USD per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 5.17 1000 USD per square kilometre 6.55 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.37 1000 USD per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 6.01 1000 USD per square kilometre 6.71 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.704 1000 USD per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Fiji or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 7.48 1000 USD per square kilometre against 6.9 1000 USD per square kilometre in Fiji as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Fiji and Mauritius?
0.58 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Mauritius?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Fiji and Mauritius rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Fiji ranks 25th and Mauritius ranks 22nd of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Fiji vs Mauritius: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/fiji/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/fiji/mauritius/">Fiji vs Mauritius: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.