How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Morocco?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Estonia vs Morocco: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Estonia

0.8044 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Morocco

0.8342 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Estonia rank

92nd

Morocco rank

90th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Estonia
Morocco

How they compare

Morocco currently reports 0.8342 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.8044 1000 USD per square kilometre in Estonia, a difference of 0.0298 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.

Estonia ranks 92nd and Morocco ranks 90th of 139 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 3 and Morocco in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Estonia	Morocco	Difference	Ahead
1990s	5.07 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.4884 1000 USD per square kilometre	4.58 1000 USD per square kilometre	Estonia
2000s	2.31 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.6352 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.67 1000 USD per square kilometre	Estonia
2010s	1.16 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.8477 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.313 1000 USD per square kilometre	Estonia
2020s	0.7772 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.8004 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0232 1000 USD per square kilometre	Morocco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Estonia or Morocco?: Morocco, at 0.8342 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.8044 1000 USD per square kilometre in Estonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Estonia and Morocco?: 0.0298 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Morocco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Morocco?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Estonia and Morocco rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Estonia ranks 92nd and Morocco ranks 90th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Estonia vs Morocco: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/estonia/morocco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/estonia/morocco/">Estonia vs Morocco: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.