How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Lithuania?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Estonia vs Lithuania: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Estonia

0.8044 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Lithuania

0.786 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Estonia rank

92nd

Lithuania rank

93rd

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Estonia
Lithuania

How they compare

Estonia currently reports 0.8044 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.786 1000 USD per square kilometre in Lithuania, a difference of 0.0184 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.

Estonia ranks 92nd and Lithuania ranks 93rd of 139 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 2 and Lithuania in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Estonia	Lithuania	Difference	Ahead
1990s	5.07 1000 USD per square kilometre	4.76 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.3073 1000 USD per square kilometre	Estonia
2000s	2.31 1000 USD per square kilometre	2.98 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.675 1000 USD per square kilometre	Lithuania
2010s	1.16 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.21 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0485 1000 USD per square kilometre	Lithuania
2020s	0.7772 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.7281 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0492 1000 USD per square kilometre	Estonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Estonia or Lithuania?: Estonia, at 0.8044 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.786 1000 USD per square kilometre in Lithuania as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Estonia and Lithuania?: 0.0184 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Estonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Lithuania?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Estonia and Lithuania rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Estonia ranks 92nd and Lithuania ranks 93rd of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Estonia vs Lithuania: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/estonia/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/estonia/lithuania/">Estonia vs Lithuania: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.