Egypt vs Ireland: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Egypt
1.54 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Ireland
1.45 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Egypt rank
67th
Ireland rank
69th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Egypt
  • Ireland
0246810196119922023

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 1.54 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.45 1000 USD per square kilometre in Ireland, a difference of 0.09 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Egypt's figure about 1.1 times Ireland's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ireland ahead.

Egypt ranks 67th and Ireland ranks 69th of 139 countries.

Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Ireland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.08 1000 USD per square kilometre 7.94 1000 USD per square kilometre 7.86 1000 USD per square kilometre Ireland
1970s 0.146 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.41 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.27 1000 USD per square kilometre Ireland
1980s 0.2691 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.23 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.96 1000 USD per square kilometre Ireland
1990s 0.3573 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.65 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.29 1000 USD per square kilometre Ireland
2000s 0.4876 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.96 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.47 1000 USD per square kilometre Ireland
2010s 0.8425 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.61 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7669 1000 USD per square kilometre Ireland
2020s 1.31 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.57 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2592 1000 USD per square kilometre Ireland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Egypt or Ireland?
Egypt, at 1.54 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.45 1000 USD per square kilometre in Ireland as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Egypt and Ireland?
0.09 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Ireland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Egypt and Ireland rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Egypt ranks 67th and Ireland ranks 69th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Ireland: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/egypt-arab-rep/ireland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/egypt-arab-rep/ireland/">Egypt vs Ireland: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.