Ecuador vs Mexico: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Ecuador
0.5134 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico
0.4773 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
107th
Mexico rank
109th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Ecuador
  • Mexico
00.250.50.7511.2196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0.5134 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.4773 1000 USD per square kilometre in Mexico, a difference of 0.0361 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Mexico's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 107th and Mexico ranks 109th of 139 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Mexico Difference Ahead
1960s 0.7258 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1084 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6173 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 0.9216 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1728 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7488 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 0.6502 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2253 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4248 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 0.69 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2935 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3965 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 0.5555 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3781 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1774 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0.585 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4065 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1785 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 0.5395 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4677 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0717 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Ecuador or Mexico?
Ecuador, at 0.5134 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.4773 1000 USD per square kilometre in Mexico as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Ecuador and Mexico?
0.0361 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Mexico?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Mexico rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Ecuador ranks 107th and Mexico ranks 109th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Mexico: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/ecuador/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/ecuador/mexico/">Ecuador vs Mexico: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.