How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Romania?

31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Czechia vs Romania: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Czechia

1.8 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Romania

1.86 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Czechia rank

61st

Romania rank

60th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Czechia
Romania

How they compare

Romania currently reports 1.86 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.8 1000 USD per square kilometre in Czechia, a difference of 0.06 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.

Czechia ranks 61st and Romania ranks 60th of 139 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Czechia	Romania	Difference	Ahead
1990s	4.95 1000 USD per square kilometre	5.36 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.4049 1000 USD per square kilometre	Romania
2000s	2.85 1000 USD per square kilometre	6.12 1000 USD per square kilometre	3.28 1000 USD per square kilometre	Romania
2010s	2.02 1000 USD per square kilometre	4.85 1000 USD per square kilometre	2.83 1000 USD per square kilometre	Romania
2020s	2.03 1000 USD per square kilometre	2.18 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.1444 1000 USD per square kilometre	Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Czechia or Romania?: Romania, at 1.86 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.8 1000 USD per square kilometre in Czechia as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Czechia and Romania?: 0.06 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Romania?: 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Czechia and Romania rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Czechia ranks 61st and Romania ranks 60th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs Romania: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/czechia/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/czechia/romania/">Czechia vs Romania: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.