How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Italy?

31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Czechia vs Italy: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Czechia

1.8 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Italy

1.92 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Czechia rank

61st

Italy rank

59th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Czechia
Italy

How they compare

Italy currently reports 1.92 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.8 1000 USD per square kilometre in Czechia, a difference of 0.12 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Italy's figure about 1.1 times Czechia's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.

Czechia ranks 61st and Italy ranks 59th of 139 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 2 and Italy in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Czechia	Italy	Difference	Ahead
1990s	4.95 1000 USD per square kilometre	3.2 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.75 1000 USD per square kilometre	Czechia
2000s	2.85 1000 USD per square kilometre	2.76 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.086 1000 USD per square kilometre	Czechia
2010s	2.02 1000 USD per square kilometre	2.13 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.1113 1000 USD per square kilometre	Italy
2020s	2.03 1000 USD per square kilometre	2.05 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0188 1000 USD per square kilometre	Italy

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Czechia or Italy?: Italy, at 1.92 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.8 1000 USD per square kilometre in Czechia as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Czechia and Italy?: 0.12 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Italy ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Italy?: 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Czechia and Italy rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Czechia ranks 61st and Italy ranks 59th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs Italy: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/czechia/italy/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/czechia/italy/">Czechia vs Italy: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.