Cyprus vs Pakistan: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Cyprus
3.5 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
3.78 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Cyprus rank
43rd
Pakistan rank
41st

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Cyprus
  • Pakistan
02.557.510196119922023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 3.78 1000 USD per square kilometre against 3.5 1000 USD per square kilometre in Cyprus, a difference of 0.28 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Cyprus's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cyprus ahead.

Cyprus ranks 43rd and Pakistan ranks 41st of 139 countries.

Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 7.2 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0664 1000 USD per square kilometre 7.13 1000 USD per square kilometre Cyprus
1970s 7.9 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.115 1000 USD per square kilometre 7.79 1000 USD per square kilometre Cyprus
1980s 7.77 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3048 1000 USD per square kilometre 7.47 1000 USD per square kilometre Cyprus
1990s 7.88 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5356 1000 USD per square kilometre 7.35 1000 USD per square kilometre Cyprus
2000s 5.97 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.951 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.02 1000 USD per square kilometre Cyprus
2010s 4.63 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.74 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.89 1000 USD per square kilometre Cyprus
2020s 3.89 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.04 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8517 1000 USD per square kilometre Cyprus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Cyprus or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 3.78 1000 USD per square kilometre against 3.5 1000 USD per square kilometre in Cyprus as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Cyprus and Pakistan?
0.28 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Pakistan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cyprus and Pakistan rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Cyprus ranks 43rd and Pakistan ranks 41st of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cyprus vs Pakistan: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/cyprus/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/cyprus/pakistan/">Cyprus vs Pakistan: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.