Costa Rica vs Kenya: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Costa Rica
2.37 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Kenya
2.37 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
50th
Kenya rank
51st

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Kenya
0123196119922023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 2.37 1000 USD per square kilometre against 2.37 1000 USD per square kilometre in Kenya, a difference of 0 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Kenya ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 50th and Kenya ranks 51st of 139 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 5 and Kenya in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Kenya Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3391 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4413 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1022 1000 USD per square kilometre Kenya
1970s 0.4358 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6074 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1716 1000 USD per square kilometre Kenya
1980s 0.8111 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7446 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0665 1000 USD per square kilometre Costa Rica
1990s 2.14 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9764 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.17 1000 USD per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 2.72 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.79 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9336 1000 USD per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 2.63 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.16 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4687 1000 USD per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 2.11 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.1 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.008 1000 USD per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Costa Rica or Kenya?
Costa Rica, at 2.37 1000 USD per square kilometre against 2.37 1000 USD per square kilometre in Kenya as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Costa Rica and Kenya?
0 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Kenya?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Kenya rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Costa Rica ranks 50th and Kenya ranks 51st of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Kenya: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/costa-rica/kenya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/costa-rica/kenya/">Costa Rica vs Kenya: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.