How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Palestine?

29 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2022.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Congo vs Palestine: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Congo

6.83 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Palestine

7.06 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2022

Congo rank

27th

Palestine rank

24th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Congo
Palestine

How they compare

Palestine currently reports 7.06 1000 USD per square kilometre against 6.83 1000 USD per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0.23 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Palestine ahead.

Congo ranks 27th and Palestine ranks 24th of 139 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Palestine in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Congo	Palestine	Difference	Ahead
1990s	3.25 1000 USD per square kilometre	4.46 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.21 1000 USD per square kilometre	Palestine
2000s	4.22 1000 USD per square kilometre	5.02 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.8 1000 USD per square kilometre	Palestine
2010s	6.08 1000 USD per square kilometre	5.09 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.9889 1000 USD per square kilometre	Congo
2020s	6.74 1000 USD per square kilometre	6.44 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.3006 1000 USD per square kilometre	Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Congo or Palestine?: Palestine, at 7.06 1000 USD per square kilometre against 6.83 1000 USD per square kilometre in Congo as of 2022.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Congo and Palestine?: 0.23 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Palestine ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Palestine?: 29 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2022.
How do Congo and Palestine rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Congo ranks 27th and Palestine ranks 24th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Palestine: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/congo-rep/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/congo-rep/west-bank-and-gaza/">Congo vs Palestine: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.