Canada vs Chad: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Canada
0.1677 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad
0.1896 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Canada rank
127th
Chad rank
126th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Canada
  • Chad
00.10.20.3196119922023

How they compare

Chad currently reports 0.1896 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.1677 1000 USD per square kilometre in Canada, a difference of 0.0219 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Chad's figure about 1.1 times Canada's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chad ahead.

Canada ranks 127th and Chad ranks 126th of 139 countries.

Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Chad Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0565 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0969 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0404 1000 USD per square kilometre Chad
1970s 0.0597 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.134 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0743 1000 USD per square kilometre Chad
1980s 0.0707 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2249 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1543 1000 USD per square kilometre Chad
1990s 0.0931 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2236 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1305 1000 USD per square kilometre Chad
2000s 0.1225 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1723 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0499 1000 USD per square kilometre Chad
2010s 0.1402 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1861 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0459 1000 USD per square kilometre Chad
2020s 0.1568 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1893 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0325 1000 USD per square kilometre Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Canada or Chad?
Chad, at 0.1896 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.1677 1000 USD per square kilometre in Canada as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Canada and Chad?
0.0219 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Chad?
55 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Canada and Chad rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Canada ranks 127th and Chad ranks 126th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Chad: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/canada/chad/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/canada/chad/">Canada vs Chad: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.