Cambodia vs Japan: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Cambodia
13.81 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Japan
12.89 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Cambodia rank
17th
Japan rank
18th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Cambodia
  • Japan
0204060196119922023

How they compare

Cambodia currently reports 13.81 1000 USD per square kilometre against 12.89 1000 USD per square kilometre in Japan, a difference of 0.92 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Cambodia's figure about 1.1 times Japan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Japan ahead.

Cambodia ranks 17th and Japan ranks 18th of 139 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 1 and Japan in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Japan Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0669 1000 USD per square kilometre 42.77 1000 USD per square kilometre 42.71 1000 USD per square kilometre Japan
1970s 0.0829 1000 USD per square kilometre 23.32 1000 USD per square kilometre 23.24 1000 USD per square kilometre Japan
1980s 0.1735 1000 USD per square kilometre 22.42 1000 USD per square kilometre 22.24 1000 USD per square kilometre Japan
1990s 0.1867 1000 USD per square kilometre 19.46 1000 USD per square kilometre 19.27 1000 USD per square kilometre Japan
2000s 1.41 1000 USD per square kilometre 16.54 1000 USD per square kilometre 15.12 1000 USD per square kilometre Japan
2010s 10.79 1000 USD per square kilometre 13.87 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.08 1000 USD per square kilometre Japan
2020s 13.6 1000 USD per square kilometre 12.59 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.01 1000 USD per square kilometre Cambodia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Cambodia or Japan?
Cambodia, at 13.81 1000 USD per square kilometre against 12.89 1000 USD per square kilometre in Japan as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Cambodia and Japan?
0.92 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Cambodia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Japan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cambodia and Japan rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Cambodia ranks 17th and Japan ranks 18th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs Japan: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/cambodia/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/cambodia/japan/">Cambodia vs Japan: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.