Burundi vs Malawi: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Burundi
44.74 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi
57.03 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Burundi rank
3rd
Malawi rank
1st

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Burundi
  • Malawi
0204060196119922023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 57.03 1000 USD per square kilometre against 44.74 1000 USD per square kilometre in Burundi, a difference of 12.29 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.3 times Burundi's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Burundi ahead.

Burundi ranks 3rd and Malawi ranks 1st of 139 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 4 and Malawi in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Malawi Difference Ahead
1960s 8.58 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8297 1000 USD per square kilometre 7.75 1000 USD per square kilometre Burundi
1970s 8.71 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.76 1000 USD per square kilometre 6.95 1000 USD per square kilometre Burundi
1980s 11.19 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.24 1000 USD per square kilometre 8.95 1000 USD per square kilometre Burundi
1990s 12.8 1000 USD per square kilometre 7.47 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.33 1000 USD per square kilometre Burundi
2000s 14.06 1000 USD per square kilometre 21.29 1000 USD per square kilometre 7.23 1000 USD per square kilometre Malawi
2010s 30.85 1000 USD per square kilometre 39.59 1000 USD per square kilometre 8.74 1000 USD per square kilometre Malawi
2020s 45.78 1000 USD per square kilometre 55.33 1000 USD per square kilometre 9.56 1000 USD per square kilometre Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Burundi or Malawi?
Malawi, at 57.03 1000 USD per square kilometre against 44.74 1000 USD per square kilometre in Burundi as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Burundi and Malawi?
12.29 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Malawi?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Burundi and Malawi rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Burundi ranks 3rd and Malawi ranks 1st of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Malawi: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/burundi/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/burundi/malawi/">Burundi vs Malawi: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.