Bosnia and Herzegovina vs El Salvador: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Bosnia and Herzegovina
1.43 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador
1.42 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
70th
El Salvador rank
71st

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • El Salvador
00.511.522.5196119922023

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 1.43 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.42 1000 USD per square kilometre in El Salvador, a difference of 0.01 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 70th and El Salvador ranks 71st of 139 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina El Salvador Difference Ahead
1990s 1.92 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.4 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5156 1000 USD per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s 1.97 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.34 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6238 1000 USD per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 1.82 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.47 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3536 1000 USD per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 1.69 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.49 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1979 1000 USD per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Bosnia and Herzegovina or El Salvador?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 1.43 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.42 1000 USD per square kilometre in El Salvador as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and El Salvador?
0.01 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and El Salvador?
28 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and El Salvador rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 70th and El Salvador ranks 71st of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs El Salvador: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/bosnia-and-herzegovina/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/bosnia-and-herzegovina/el-salvador/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs El Salvador: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.