Belize vs Namibia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Belize
0.0947 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.0758 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Belize rank
130th
Namibia rank
133rd

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Belize
  • Namibia
0.0250.050.0750.10.1250.15196119922023

How they compare

Belize currently reports 0.0947 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0758 1000 USD per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.0189 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Belize's figure about 1.2 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Belize ahead.

Belize ranks 130th and Namibia ranks 133rd of 139 countries.

Belize has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belize Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0629 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0315 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0314 1000 USD per square kilometre Belize
1970s 0.0624 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0351 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0273 1000 USD per square kilometre Belize
1980s 0.1032 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0395 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0637 1000 USD per square kilometre Belize
1990s 0.0715 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0442 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0273 1000 USD per square kilometre Belize
2000s 0.0829 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.06 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0229 1000 USD per square kilometre Belize
2010s 0.077 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0706 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0064 1000 USD per square kilometre Belize
2020s 0.0832 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0758 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0074 1000 USD per square kilometre Belize

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Belize or Namibia?
Belize, at 0.0947 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0758 1000 USD per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Belize and Namibia?
0.0189 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Belize ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Belize and Namibia rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Belize ranks 130th and Namibia ranks 133rd of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belize vs Namibia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/belize/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/belize/namibia/">Belize vs Namibia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.