How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Cambodia?

24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belgium vs Cambodia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Belgium

16.08 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Cambodia

13.81 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Belgium rank

14th

Cambodia rank

17th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Belgium
Cambodia

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 16.08 1000 USD per square kilometre against 13.81 1000 USD per square kilometre in Cambodia, a difference of 2.27 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Belgium's figure about 1.2 times Cambodia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.

Belgium ranks 14th and Cambodia ranks 17th of 139 countries.

Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belgium	Cambodia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	11.64 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.41 1000 USD per square kilometre	10.22 1000 USD per square kilometre	Belgium
2010s	14.82 1000 USD per square kilometre	10.79 1000 USD per square kilometre	4.03 1000 USD per square kilometre	Belgium
2020s	15.39 1000 USD per square kilometre	13.6 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.79 1000 USD per square kilometre	Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Belgium or Cambodia?: Belgium, at 16.08 1000 USD per square kilometre against 13.81 1000 USD per square kilometre in Cambodia as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Belgium and Cambodia?: 2.27 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Cambodia?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Belgium and Cambodia rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Belgium ranks 14th and Cambodia ranks 17th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Cambodia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/belgium/cambodia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/belgium/cambodia/">Belgium vs Cambodia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.