How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Senegal?

30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belarus vs Senegal: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Belarus

3.05 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Senegal

2.58 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Belarus rank

45th

Senegal rank

48th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Belarus
Senegal

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 3.05 1000 USD per square kilometre against 2.58 1000 USD per square kilometre in Senegal, a difference of 0.47 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.2 times Senegal's.

Across all 30 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 45th and Senegal ranks 48th of 139 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belarus	Senegal	Difference	Ahead
1990s	6.41 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.1309 1000 USD per square kilometre	6.28 1000 USD per square kilometre	Belarus
2000s	6.35 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.522 1000 USD per square kilometre	5.83 1000 USD per square kilometre	Belarus
2010s	4.33 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.8135 1000 USD per square kilometre	3.52 1000 USD per square kilometre	Belarus
2020s	2.85 1000 USD per square kilometre	2.5 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.3421 1000 USD per square kilometre	Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Belarus or Senegal?: Belarus, at 3.05 1000 USD per square kilometre against 2.58 1000 USD per square kilometre in Senegal as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Belarus and Senegal?: 0.47 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Senegal?: 30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Senegal rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Belarus ranks 45th and Senegal ranks 48th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Senegal: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/belarus/senegal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/belarus/senegal/">Belarus vs Senegal: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.