How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Cyprus?

30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belarus vs Cyprus: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Belarus

3.05 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Cyprus

3.5 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Belarus rank

45th

Cyprus rank

43rd

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Belarus
Cyprus

How they compare

Cyprus currently reports 3.5 1000 USD per square kilometre against 3.05 1000 USD per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 0.45 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Cyprus's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 45th and Cyprus ranks 43rd of 139 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Cyprus in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belarus	Cyprus	Difference	Ahead
1990s	6.41 1000 USD per square kilometre	7.44 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.03 1000 USD per square kilometre	Cyprus
2000s	6.35 1000 USD per square kilometre	5.97 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.3777 1000 USD per square kilometre	Belarus
2010s	4.33 1000 USD per square kilometre	4.63 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.2941 1000 USD per square kilometre	Cyprus
2020s	2.85 1000 USD per square kilometre	3.89 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.04 1000 USD per square kilometre	Cyprus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Belarus or Cyprus?: Cyprus, at 3.5 1000 USD per square kilometre against 3.05 1000 USD per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Belarus and Cyprus?: 0.45 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Cyprus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Cyprus?: 30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Cyprus rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Belarus ranks 45th and Cyprus ranks 43rd of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Cyprus: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/belarus/cyprus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/belarus/cyprus/">Belarus vs Cyprus: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.