How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Belgium?

24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Barbados vs Belgium: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Barbados

20.44 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Belgium

16.08 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Barbados rank

11th

Belgium rank

14th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Barbados
Belgium

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 20.44 1000 USD per square kilometre against 16.08 1000 USD per square kilometre in Belgium, a difference of 4.36 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.3 times Belgium's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 11th and Belgium ranks 14th of 139 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 2 and Belgium in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Barbados	Belgium	Difference	Ahead
2000s	18.99 1000 USD per square kilometre	11.64 1000 USD per square kilometre	7.35 1000 USD per square kilometre	Barbados
2010s	13.68 1000 USD per square kilometre	14.82 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.14 1000 USD per square kilometre	Belgium
2020s	18.06 1000 USD per square kilometre	15.39 1000 USD per square kilometre	2.66 1000 USD per square kilometre	Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Barbados or Belgium?: Barbados, at 20.44 1000 USD per square kilometre against 16.08 1000 USD per square kilometre in Belgium as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Barbados and Belgium?: 4.36 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Belgium?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Belgium rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Barbados ranks 11th and Belgium ranks 14th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Belgium: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/barbados/belgium/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/barbados/belgium/">Barbados vs Belgium: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.