Bangladesh vs Israel: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Bangladesh
15.09 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Israel
14.66 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
15th
Israel rank
16th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Israel
05101520196119922023

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 15.09 1000 USD per square kilometre against 14.66 1000 USD per square kilometre in Israel, a difference of 0.43 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Israel ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 15th and Israel ranks 16th of 139 countries.

Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Israel Difference Ahead
1960s 1.35 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.96 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.61 1000 USD per square kilometre Israel
1970s 2.15 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.87 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.72 1000 USD per square kilometre Israel
1980s 2.39 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.91 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.52 1000 USD per square kilometre Israel
1990s 2.71 1000 USD per square kilometre 8.06 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.35 1000 USD per square kilometre Israel
2000s 6.57 1000 USD per square kilometre 15.84 1000 USD per square kilometre 9.26 1000 USD per square kilometre Israel
2010s 13.05 1000 USD per square kilometre 17.64 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.59 1000 USD per square kilometre Israel
2020s 14.46 1000 USD per square kilometre 15.74 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.28 1000 USD per square kilometre Israel

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Bangladesh or Israel?
Bangladesh, at 15.09 1000 USD per square kilometre against 14.66 1000 USD per square kilometre in Israel as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Bangladesh and Israel?
0.43 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Israel?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Israel rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Bangladesh ranks 15th and Israel ranks 16th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Israel: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/bangladesh/israel/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/bangladesh/israel/">Bangladesh vs Israel: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.