How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Zambia?

19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Azerbaijan vs Zambia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Azerbaijan

4.77 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Zambia

4.3 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Azerbaijan rank

35th

Zambia rank

38th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Azerbaijan
Zambia

How they compare

Azerbaijan currently reports 4.77 1000 USD per square kilometre against 4.3 1000 USD per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 0.47 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Azerbaijan's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.

Across all 19 years both countries report, Azerbaijan has been ahead every year.

Azerbaijan ranks 35th and Zambia ranks 38th of 139 countries.

Azerbaijan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Azerbaijan	Zambia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	4.89 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.09 1000 USD per square kilometre	3.8 1000 USD per square kilometre	Azerbaijan
2010s	4.36 1000 USD per square kilometre	2.01 1000 USD per square kilometre	2.35 1000 USD per square kilometre	Azerbaijan
2020s	4.94 1000 USD per square kilometre	3.73 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.21 1000 USD per square kilometre	Azerbaijan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Azerbaijan or Zambia?: Azerbaijan, at 4.77 1000 USD per square kilometre against 4.3 1000 USD per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Azerbaijan and Zambia?: 0.47 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Azerbaijan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Zambia?: 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
How do Azerbaijan and Zambia rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Azerbaijan ranks 35th and Zambia ranks 38th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Azerbaijan vs Zambia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/azerbaijan/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/azerbaijan/zambia/">Azerbaijan vs Zambia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.