Australia vs Qatar: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Australia
0.0878 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Qatar
0.0661 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
131st
Qatar rank
134th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Australia
  • Qatar
00.020.040.060.08196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0.0878 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0661 1000 USD per square kilometre in Qatar, a difference of 0.0217 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.3 times Qatar's.

Across all 53 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 131st and Qatar ranks 134th of 139 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Qatar Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0397 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0039 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0359 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia
1980s 0.0514 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0069 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0446 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia
1990s 0.0657 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.006 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0597 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia
2000s 0.0718 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0016 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0702 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia
2010s 0.0717 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0032 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0686 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia
2020s 0.0832 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0353 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0479 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Australia or Qatar?
Australia, at 0.0878 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0661 1000 USD per square kilometre in Qatar as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Australia and Qatar?
0.0217 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Qatar?
53 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
How do Australia and Qatar rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Australia ranks 131st and Qatar ranks 134th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Qatar: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/australia/qatar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/australia/qatar/">Australia vs Qatar: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.