Australia vs Kazakhstan: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Australia
0.0878 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Kazakhstan
0.1667 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
131st
Kazakhstan rank
128th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Australia
  • Kazakhstan
00.050.10.150.2196119922023

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 0.1667 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0878 1000 USD per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 0.0789 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.9 times Australia's.

Across all 30 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 131st and Kazakhstan ranks 128th of 139 countries.

Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0685 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1336 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0651 1000 USD per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2000s 0.0718 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1883 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1165 1000 USD per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2010s 0.0717 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1391 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0674 1000 USD per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2020s 0.0832 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.175 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0917 1000 USD per square kilometre Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Australia or Kazakhstan?
Kazakhstan, at 0.1667 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0878 1000 USD per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Australia and Kazakhstan?
0.0789 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Kazakhstan?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Australia and Kazakhstan rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Australia ranks 131st and Kazakhstan ranks 128th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Kazakhstan: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/australia/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/australia/kazakhstan/">Australia vs Kazakhstan: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.