How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Pakistan?

27 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Armenia vs Pakistan: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Armenia

3.75 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Pakistan

3.78 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Armenia rank

42nd

Pakistan rank

41st

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Armenia
Pakistan

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 3.78 1000 USD per square kilometre against 3.75 1000 USD per square kilometre in Armenia, a difference of 0.03 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Armenia ahead.

Armenia ranks 42nd and Pakistan ranks 41st of 139 countries.

Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Armenia	Pakistan	Difference	Ahead
1990s	4.13 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.6633 1000 USD per square kilometre	3.47 1000 USD per square kilometre	Armenia
2000s	5.14 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.951 1000 USD per square kilometre	4.19 1000 USD per square kilometre	Armenia
2010s	5.74 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.74 1000 USD per square kilometre	4 1000 USD per square kilometre	Armenia
2020s	3.91 1000 USD per square kilometre	3.04 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.8731 1000 USD per square kilometre	Armenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Armenia or Pakistan?: Pakistan, at 3.78 1000 USD per square kilometre against 3.75 1000 USD per square kilometre in Armenia as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Armenia and Pakistan?: 0.03 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Pakistan?: 27 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2023.
How do Armenia and Pakistan rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Armenia ranks 42nd and Pakistan ranks 41st of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Armenia vs Pakistan: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/armenia/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/armenia/pakistan/">Armenia vs Pakistan: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.