Angola vs Indonesia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Angola
2.31 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Indonesia
2.5 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
52nd
Indonesia rank
49th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Angola
  • Indonesia
0123196119922023

How they compare

Indonesia currently reports 2.5 1000 USD per square kilometre against 2.31 1000 USD per square kilometre in Angola, a difference of 0.19 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Indonesia's figure about 1.1 times Angola's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Indonesia has been ahead every year.

Angola ranks 52nd and Indonesia ranks 49th of 139 countries.

Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Indonesia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2561 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.77 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.51 1000 USD per square kilometre Indonesia
1970s 0.266 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.76 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.49 1000 USD per square kilometre Indonesia
1980s 0.2541 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.99 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.74 1000 USD per square kilometre Indonesia
1990s 0.4077 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.38 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.98 1000 USD per square kilometre Indonesia
2000s 1.51 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.67 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.16 1000 USD per square kilometre Indonesia
2010s 2.13 1000 USD per square kilometre 3 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8786 1000 USD per square kilometre Indonesia
2020s 2.14 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.56 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4264 1000 USD per square kilometre Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Angola or Indonesia?
Indonesia, at 2.5 1000 USD per square kilometre against 2.31 1000 USD per square kilometre in Angola as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Angola and Indonesia?
0.19 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Indonesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Indonesia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Angola and Indonesia rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Angola ranks 52nd and Indonesia ranks 49th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Indonesia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/angola/indonesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/angola/indonesia/">Angola vs Indonesia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.