Angola vs Costa Rica: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Angola
2.31 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica
2.37 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
52nd
Costa Rica rank
50th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Angola
  • Costa Rica
0123196119922023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 2.37 1000 USD per square kilometre against 2.31 1000 USD per square kilometre in Angola, a difference of 0.06 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Angola ranks 52nd and Costa Rica ranks 50th of 139 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and Costa Rica in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Costa Rica Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2561 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3391 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0831 1000 USD per square kilometre Costa Rica
1970s 0.266 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4358 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1698 1000 USD per square kilometre Costa Rica
1980s 0.2541 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8111 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.557 1000 USD per square kilometre Costa Rica
1990s 0.4077 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.14 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.73 1000 USD per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 1.51 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.72 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.21 1000 USD per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 2.13 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.63 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5015 1000 USD per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 2.14 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.11 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0243 1000 USD per square kilometre Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Angola or Costa Rica?
Costa Rica, at 2.37 1000 USD per square kilometre against 2.31 1000 USD per square kilometre in Angola as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Angola and Costa Rica?
0.06 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Costa Rica?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Angola and Costa Rica rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Angola ranks 52nd and Costa Rica ranks 50th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Costa Rica: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/angola/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/angola/costa-rica/">Angola vs Costa Rica: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.