How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Samoa?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Rwanda vs Samoa: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Rwanda

0.0717 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Samoa

0.0729 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Rwanda rank

22nd

Samoa rank

21st

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Rwanda
Samoa

How they compare

Samoa currently reports 0.0729 1000 USD per person against 0.0717 1000 USD per person in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0012 1000 USD per person.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Samoa ahead.

Rwanda ranks 22nd and Samoa ranks 21st of 139 countries.

Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Rwanda	Samoa	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0477 1000 USD per person	0.1571 1000 USD per person	0.1095 1000 USD per person	Samoa
1970s	0.0666 1000 USD per person	0.1715 1000 USD per person	0.1049 1000 USD per person	Samoa
1980s	0.0698 1000 USD per person	0.1976 1000 USD per person	0.1279 1000 USD per person	Samoa
1990s	0.0473 1000 USD per person	0.0679 1000 USD per person	0.0206 1000 USD per person	Samoa
2000s	0.091 1000 USD per person	0.0994 1000 USD per person	0.0085 1000 USD per person	Samoa
2010s	0.085 1000 USD per person	0.1333 1000 USD per person	0.0483 1000 USD per person	Samoa
2020s	0.0754 1000 USD per person	0.0756 1000 USD per person	0.0002 1000 USD per person	Samoa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Rwanda or Samoa?: Samoa, at 0.0729 1000 USD per person against 0.0717 1000 USD per person in Rwanda as of 2024.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Rwanda and Samoa?: 0.0012 1000 USD per person, with Samoa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Samoa?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Rwanda and Samoa rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Rwanda ranks 22nd and Samoa ranks 21st of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Samoa: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/rwanda/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/rwanda/samoa/">Rwanda vs Samoa: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 140 places, 7,976 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.