How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Singapore?

54 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Qatar vs Singapore: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Qatar

0.0003 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Singapore

0 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Qatar rank

137th

Singapore rank

139th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Qatar
Singapore

How they compare

Qatar currently reports 0.0003 1000 USD per person against 0 1000 USD per person in Singapore, a difference of 0.0003 1000 USD per person.

That makes Qatar's figure about 302.5 times Singapore's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Singapore ahead.

Qatar ranks 137th and Singapore ranks 139th of 139 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Qatar averaged higher in 5 and Singapore in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Qatar	Singapore	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0002 1000 USD per person	0.0007 1000 USD per person	0.0005 1000 USD per person	Singapore
1980s	0.0002 1000 USD per person	0.0001 1000 USD per person	0.0001 1000 USD per person	Qatar
1990s	0.0001 1000 USD per person	0 1000 USD per person	0.0001 1000 USD per person	Qatar
2000s	0 1000 USD per person	0 1000 USD per person	0 1000 USD per person	Qatar
2010s	0 1000 USD per person	0 1000 USD per person	0 1000 USD per person	Qatar
2020s	0.0002 1000 USD per person	0 1000 USD per person	0.0002 1000 USD per person	Qatar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Qatar or Singapore?: Qatar, at 0.0003 1000 USD per person against 0 1000 USD per person in Singapore as of 2024.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Qatar and Singapore?: 0.0003 1000 USD per person, with Qatar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Singapore?: 54 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2024.
How do Qatar and Singapore rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Qatar ranks 137th and Singapore ranks 139th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Qatar vs Singapore: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/qatar/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/qatar/singapore/">Qatar vs Singapore: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 140 places, 7,976 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.