How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Zimbabwe?

45 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Israel vs Zimbabwe: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Israel

0.0309 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Zimbabwe

0.0298 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Israel rank

49th

Zimbabwe rank

50th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Israel
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Israel currently reports 0.0309 1000 USD per person against 0.0298 1000 USD per person in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0011 1000 USD per person.

Across all 45 years both countries report, Israel has been ahead every year.

Israel ranks 49th and Zimbabwe ranks 50th of 139 countries.

Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Israel	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0253 1000 USD per person	0.0031 1000 USD per person	0.0222 1000 USD per person	Israel
1970s	0.0309 1000 USD per person	0.0025 1000 USD per person	0.0284 1000 USD per person	Israel
1980s	0.0304 1000 USD per person	0.002 1000 USD per person	0.0285 1000 USD per person	Israel
1990s	0.029 1000 USD per person	0.002 1000 USD per person	0.027 1000 USD per person	Israel
2010s	0.0461 1000 USD per person	0.0218 1000 USD per person	0.0243 1000 USD per person	Israel
2020s	0.0349 1000 USD per person	0.0271 1000 USD per person	0.0078 1000 USD per person	Israel

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Israel or Zimbabwe?: Israel, at 0.0309 1000 USD per person against 0.0298 1000 USD per person in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Israel and Zimbabwe?: 0.0011 1000 USD per person, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Zimbabwe?: 45 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Israel and Zimbabwe rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Israel ranks 49th and Zimbabwe ranks 50th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Israel vs Zimbabwe: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/israel/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/israel/zimbabwe/">Israel vs Zimbabwe: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 140 places, 7,976 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.