Equatorial Guinea vs France: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Equatorial Guinea
0.041 1000 USD per person
in 2024
France
0.0435 1000 USD per person
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
33rd
France rank
32nd

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • France
0.020.040.060.080.1196119922024

How they compare

France currently reports 0.0435 1000 USD per person against 0.041 1000 USD per person in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0025 1000 USD per person.

That makes France's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was France ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 33rd and France ranks 32nd of 139 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 6 and France in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea France Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0715 1000 USD per person 0.0771 1000 USD per person 0.0056 1000 USD per person France
1970s 0.0632 1000 USD per person 0.0435 1000 USD per person 0.0197 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0.0574 1000 USD per person 0.0383 1000 USD per person 0.0191 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0.0644 1000 USD per person 0.0319 1000 USD per person 0.0325 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.0546 1000 USD per person 0.0344 1000 USD per person 0.0202 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.051 1000 USD per person 0.0363 1000 USD per person 0.0147 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.0431 1000 USD per person 0.0414 1000 USD per person 0.0017 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Equatorial Guinea or France?
France, at 0.0435 1000 USD per person against 0.041 1000 USD per person in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Equatorial Guinea and France?
0.0025 1000 USD per person, with France ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and France?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and France rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 33rd and France ranks 32nd of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs France: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/france/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/france/">Equatorial Guinea vs France: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit
1000 USD per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,976 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.