How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Iceland?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Egypt vs Iceland: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Egypt

0.0125 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Iceland

0.0129 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Egypt rank

94th

Iceland rank

93rd

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Egypt
Iceland

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0.0129 1000 USD per person against 0.0125 1000 USD per person in Egypt, a difference of 0.0004 1000 USD per person.

Across all 64 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.

Egypt ranks 94th and Iceland ranks 93rd of 139 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Egypt	Iceland	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0026 1000 USD per person	0.039 1000 USD per person	0.0364 1000 USD per person	Iceland
1970s	0.0037 1000 USD per person	0.0357 1000 USD per person	0.032 1000 USD per person	Iceland
1980s	0.0053 1000 USD per person	0.0495 1000 USD per person	0.0442 1000 USD per person	Iceland
1990s	0.0055 1000 USD per person	0.035 1000 USD per person	0.0295 1000 USD per person	Iceland
2000s	0.006 1000 USD per person	0.0341 1000 USD per person	0.0281 1000 USD per person	Iceland
2010s	0.0085 1000 USD per person	0.0235 1000 USD per person	0.015 1000 USD per person	Iceland
2020s	0.0118 1000 USD per person	0.0162 1000 USD per person	0.0044 1000 USD per person	Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Egypt or Iceland?: Iceland, at 0.0129 1000 USD per person against 0.0125 1000 USD per person in Egypt as of 2024.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Egypt and Iceland?: 0.0004 1000 USD per person, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Iceland?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Egypt and Iceland rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Egypt ranks 94th and Iceland ranks 93rd of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Iceland: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/egypt-arab-rep/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/egypt-arab-rep/iceland/">Egypt vs Iceland: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 140 places, 7,976 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.