How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Malawi?

59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Congo vs Malawi: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Congo

0.388 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Malawi

0.2541 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Congo rank

1st

Malawi rank

4th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Congo
Malawi

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.388 1000 USD per person against 0.2541 1000 USD per person in Malawi, a difference of 0.1339 1000 USD per person.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.5 times Malawi's.

Across all 59 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 1st and Malawi ranks 4th of 139 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Congo	Malawi	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.6039 1000 USD per person	0.0191 1000 USD per person	0.5848 1000 USD per person	Congo
1970s	0.4976 1000 USD per person	0.0309 1000 USD per person	0.4667 1000 USD per person	Congo
1980s	0.4929 1000 USD per person	0.0284 1000 USD per person	0.4645 1000 USD per person	Congo
1990s	0.3944 1000 USD per person	0.066 1000 USD per person	0.3284 1000 USD per person	Congo
2000s	0.391 1000 USD per person	0.1566 1000 USD per person	0.2344 1000 USD per person	Congo
2010s	0.411 1000 USD per person	0.2204 1000 USD per person	0.1906 1000 USD per person	Congo
2020s	0.3875 1000 USD per person	0.2563 1000 USD per person	0.1312 1000 USD per person	Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Congo or Malawi?: Congo, at 0.388 1000 USD per person against 0.2541 1000 USD per person in Malawi as of 2024.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Congo and Malawi?: 0.1339 1000 USD per person, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Malawi?: 59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Congo and Malawi rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Congo ranks 1st and Malawi ranks 4th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Malawi: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/congo-rep/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/congo-rep/malawi/">Congo vs Malawi: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 140 places, 7,976 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.