How many years of comparable data are there for China and Nepal?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

China vs Nepal: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

China

0.0342 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Nepal

0.0352 1000 USD per person

in 2024

China rank

43rd

Nepal rank

41st

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

China
Nepal

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 0.0352 1000 USD per person against 0.0342 1000 USD per person in China, a difference of 0.001 1000 USD per person.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China ahead.

China ranks 43rd and Nepal ranks 41st of 139 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 6 and Nepal in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	China	Nepal	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0405 1000 USD per person	0.0077 1000 USD per person	0.0328 1000 USD per person	China
1970s	0.0457 1000 USD per person	0.0075 1000 USD per person	0.0381 1000 USD per person	China
1980s	0.0388 1000 USD per person	0.0088 1000 USD per person	0.03 1000 USD per person	China
1990s	0.0399 1000 USD per person	0.0127 1000 USD per person	0.0272 1000 USD per person	China
2000s	0.0394 1000 USD per person	0.0202 1000 USD per person	0.0192 1000 USD per person	China
2010s	0.0335 1000 USD per person	0.0297 1000 USD per person	0.0038 1000 USD per person	China
2020s	0.0338 1000 USD per person	0.034 1000 USD per person	0.0001 1000 USD per person	Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), China or Nepal?: Nepal, at 0.0352 1000 USD per person against 0.0342 1000 USD per person in China as of 2024.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between China and Nepal?: 0.001 1000 USD per person, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Nepal?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do China and Nepal rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: China ranks 43rd and Nepal ranks 41st of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Nepal: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/china/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/china/nepal/">China vs Nepal: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 140 places, 7,976 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.