Bhutan vs Equatorial Guinea: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Bhutan
0.0461 1000 USD per person
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea
0.041 1000 USD per person
in 2024
Bhutan rank
30th
Equatorial Guinea rank
33rd

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Bhutan
  • Equatorial Guinea
00.020.040.060.08196119922024

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 0.0461 1000 USD per person against 0.041 1000 USD per person in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0051 1000 USD per person.

That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Bhutan ranks 30th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 33rd of 139 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 2 and Equatorial Guinea in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0515 1000 USD per person 0.0715 1000 USD per person 0.02 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
1970s 0.0468 1000 USD per person 0.0632 1000 USD per person 0.0164 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0.0439 1000 USD per person 0.0574 1000 USD per person 0.0136 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0.043 1000 USD per person 0.0644 1000 USD per person 0.0214 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.0496 1000 USD per person 0.0546 1000 USD per person 0.005 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.0524 1000 USD per person 0.051 1000 USD per person 0.0014 1000 USD per person Bhutan
2020s 0.0469 1000 USD per person 0.0431 1000 USD per person 0.0038 1000 USD per person Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Bhutan or Equatorial Guinea?
Bhutan, at 0.0461 1000 USD per person against 0.041 1000 USD per person in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Bhutan and Equatorial Guinea?
0.0051 1000 USD per person, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Equatorial Guinea?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Bhutan and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Bhutan ranks 30th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 33rd of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Equatorial Guinea: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/bhutan/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/bhutan/equatorial-guinea/">Bhutan vs Equatorial Guinea: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit
1000 USD per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,976 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.