How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Turkmenistan?

31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belarus vs Turkmenistan: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Belarus

0.0525 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Turkmenistan

0.0477 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Belarus rank

27th

Turkmenistan rank

28th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Belarus
Turkmenistan

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0.0525 1000 USD per person against 0.0477 1000 USD per person in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0.0048 1000 USD per person.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Turkmenistan's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 27th and Turkmenistan ranks 28th of 139 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belarus	Turkmenistan	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.1283 1000 USD per person	0.0024 1000 USD per person	0.1259 1000 USD per person	Belarus
2000s	0.1326 1000 USD per person	0.0168 1000 USD per person	0.1159 1000 USD per person	Belarus
2010s	0.093 1000 USD per person	0.0222 1000 USD per person	0.0708 1000 USD per person	Belarus
2020s	0.0604 1000 USD per person	0.0399 1000 USD per person	0.0205 1000 USD per person	Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Belarus or Turkmenistan?: Belarus, at 0.0525 1000 USD per person against 0.0477 1000 USD per person in Turkmenistan as of 2024.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Belarus and Turkmenistan?: 0.0048 1000 USD per person, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Turkmenistan?: 31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.
How do Belarus and Turkmenistan rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Belarus ranks 27th and Turkmenistan ranks 28th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Turkmenistan: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/belarus/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/belarus/turkmenistan/">Belarus vs Turkmenistan: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 140 places, 7,976 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.