How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and New Caledonia?

31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belarus vs New Caledonia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Belarus

0.0525 1000 USD per person

in 2024

New Caledonia

0.0646 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Belarus rank

27th

New Caledonia rank

25th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Belarus
New Caledonia

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 0.0646 1000 USD per person against 0.0525 1000 USD per person in Belarus, a difference of 0.0121 1000 USD per person.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.2 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1994 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Belarus ranks 27th and New Caledonia ranks 25th of 139 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and New Caledonia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belarus	New Caledonia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.1283 1000 USD per person	0.2363 1000 USD per person	0.108 1000 USD per person	New Caledonia
2000s	0.1326 1000 USD per person	0.0941 1000 USD per person	0.0386 1000 USD per person	Belarus
2010s	0.093 1000 USD per person	0.068 1000 USD per person	0.0251 1000 USD per person	Belarus
2020s	0.0604 1000 USD per person	0.0676 1000 USD per person	0.0072 1000 USD per person	New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Belarus or New Caledonia?: New Caledonia, at 0.0646 1000 USD per person against 0.0525 1000 USD per person in Belarus as of 2024.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Belarus and New Caledonia?: 0.0121 1000 USD per person, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and New Caledonia?: 31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.
How do Belarus and New Caledonia rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Belarus ranks 27th and New Caledonia ranks 25th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs New Caledonia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/belarus/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/belarus/new-caledonia/">Belarus vs New Caledonia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 140 places, 7,976 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.