South Africa vs Sweden: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

South Africa
8.01 % change on previous year
in 2024
Sweden
8.62 % change on previous year
in 2024
South Africa rank
41st
Sweden rank
39th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • South Africa
  • Sweden
-40-200204060196219932024

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 8.62 % change on previous year against 8.01 % change on previous year in South Africa, a difference of 0.61 % change on previous year.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.

The two have swapped places 37 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was South Africa ahead.

South Africa ranks 41st and Sweden ranks 39th of 162 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, South Africa averaged higher in 5 and Sweden in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 5.35 % change on previous year -4.1 % change on previous year 9.44 % change on previous year South Africa
1970s 3.37 % change on previous year 6.54 % change on previous year 3.17 % change on previous year Sweden
1980s 6.3 % change on previous year 0.8851 % change on previous year 5.42 % change on previous year South Africa
1990s 3.86 % change on previous year -0.8843 % change on previous year 4.74 % change on previous year South Africa
2000s 0.685 % change on previous year -1.09 % change on previous year 1.77 % change on previous year South Africa
2010s 3.95 % change on previous year 0.2466 % change on previous year 3.7 % change on previous year South Africa
2020s -0.4481 % change on previous year 0.9157 % change on previous year 1.36 % change on previous year Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), South Africa or Sweden?
Sweden, at 8.62 % change on previous year against 8.01 % change on previous year in South Africa as of 2024.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between South Africa and Sweden?
0.61 % change on previous year, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Sweden?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do South Africa and Sweden rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
South Africa ranks 41st and Sweden ranks 39th of 162 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Sweden: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-annual/south-africa/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-annual/south-africa/sweden/">South Africa vs Sweden: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 10,965 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.