Northern America vs Zimbabwe: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Northern America
-2.91 % change on previous year
in 2024
Zimbabwe
11.01 % change on previous year
in 2024
Northern America rank
27th
Zimbabwe rank
29th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Northern America
  • Zimbabwe
-2002040196219932024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 11.01 % change on previous year against -2.91 % change on previous year in Northern America, a difference of 13.92 % change on previous year.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 3.8 times Northern America's.

The two have swapped places 26 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Northern America ranks 27th and Zimbabwe ranks 29th of 30 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, Northern America averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Northern America Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 1.12 % change on previous year 1.6 % change on previous year 0.4768 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
1970s 1.11 % change on previous year 0.3215 % change on previous year 0.7918 % change on previous year Northern America
1980s 0.9755 % change on previous year 3.38 % change on previous year 2.4 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
1990s 8.02 % change on previous year 3.34 % change on previous year 4.68 % change on previous year Northern America
2010s 0.7473 % change on previous year 5.75 % change on previous year 5 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2020s 0.276 % change on previous year 12.71 % change on previous year 12.44 % change on previous year Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Northern America or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 11.01 % change on previous year against -2.91 % change on previous year in Northern America as of 2024.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Northern America and Zimbabwe?
13.92 % change on previous year, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Northern America and Zimbabwe?
43 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Northern America and Zimbabwe rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Northern America ranks 27th and Zimbabwe ranks 29th of 30 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Northern America vs Zimbabwe: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-annual/northern-america/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-annual/northern-america/zimbabwe/">Northern America vs Zimbabwe: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 10,965 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.