Central Asia vs Chile: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Central Asia
10.49 % change on previous year
in 2024
Chile
45.97 % change on previous year
in 2024
Central Asia rank
2nd
Chile rank
1st

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Central Asia
  • Chile
02004006008001.0k196219932024

How they compare

Chile currently reports 45.97 % change on previous year against 10.49 % change on previous year in Central Asia, a difference of 35.48 % change on previous year.

That makes Chile's figure about 4.4 times Central Asia's.

The two have swapped places 19 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Central Asia ahead.

Central Asia ranks 2nd and Chile ranks 1st of 30 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Central Asia averaged higher in 3 and Chile in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Asia Chile Difference Ahead
1990s 168.57 % change on previous year 1.5 % change on previous year 167.07 % change on previous year Central Asia
2000s 6.18 % change on previous year 1.21 % change on previous year 4.97 % change on previous year Central Asia
2010s 0.4067 % change on previous year 4.92 % change on previous year 4.52 % change on previous year Chile
2020s 4.8 % change on previous year 4.01 % change on previous year 0.7865 % change on previous year Central Asia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Central Asia or Chile?
Chile, at 45.97 % change on previous year against 10.49 % change on previous year in Central Asia as of 2024.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Central Asia and Chile?
35.48 % change on previous year, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Chile?
32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
How do Central Asia and Chile rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Central Asia ranks 2nd and Chile ranks 1st of 30 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Asia vs Chile: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-annual/central-asia/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-annual/central-asia/chile/">Central Asia vs Chile: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 10,965 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.