Colombia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value

Colombia
3.33 billion 1000 SLC
in 2024
United Republic of Tanzania
4.56 billion 1000 SLC
in 2024
Colombia rank
4th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
4th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value over time

  • Colombia
  • United Republic of Tanzania
1.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B5.0B196119922024

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 4.56 billion 1000 SLC against 3.33 billion 1000 SLC in Colombia, a difference of 1.22 billion 1000 SLC.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 1.4 times Colombia's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Colombia ranks 4th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 4th of 149 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 6 and United Republic of Tanzania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 1.30 billion 1000 SLC 1.21 billion 1000 SLC 86.12 million 1000 SLC Colombia
1970s 2.51 billion 1000 SLC 1.73 billion 1000 SLC 786.20 million 1000 SLC Colombia
1980s 2.99 billion 1000 SLC 2.66 billion 1000 SLC 328.76 million 1000 SLC Colombia
1990s 3.60 billion 1000 SLC 2.56 billion 1000 SLC 1.03 billion 1000 SLC Colombia
2000s 3.31 billion 1000 SLC 2.38 billion 1000 SLC 926.23 million 1000 SLC Colombia
2010s 3.83 billion 1000 SLC 3.46 billion 1000 SLC 370.08 million 1000 SLC Colombia
2020s 3.33 billion 1000 SLC 4.50 billion 1000 SLC 1.16 billion 1000 SLC United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value, Colombia or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 4.56 billion 1000 SLC against 3.33 billion 1000 SLC in Colombia as of 2024.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value between Colombia and United Republic of Tanzania?
1.22 billion 1000 SLC, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and United Republic of Tanzania?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Colombia and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value?
Colombia ranks 4th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 4th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc/colombia/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc/colombia/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Colombia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC)
Unit
1000 SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
162 places, 9,306 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.