Tajikistan vs Trinidad and Tobago: Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC

Tajikistan
12.08 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
11.1 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Tajikistan rank
80th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
82nd

Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Tajikistan
  • Trinidad and Tobago
0102030196119922023

How they compare

Tajikistan currently reports 12.08 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 11.1 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.98 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Tajikistan's figure about 1.1 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Tajikistan ranks 80th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 82nd of 141 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tajikistan Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1990s 1.56 1000 SLC per square kilometre 7.76 1000 SLC per square kilometre 6.2 1000 SLC per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 5.37 1000 SLC per square kilometre 11.36 1000 SLC per square kilometre 6 1000 SLC per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 9.58 1000 SLC per square kilometre 12.5 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2.92 1000 SLC per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 11.34 1000 SLC per square kilometre 13.1 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.76 1000 SLC per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Tajikistan or Trinidad and Tobago?
Tajikistan, at 12.08 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 11.1 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Tajikistan and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.98 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Tajikistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tajikistan and Trinidad and Tobago?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Tajikistan and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Tajikistan ranks 80th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 82nd of 141 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tajikistan vs Trinidad and Tobago: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/tajikistan/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/tajikistan/trinidad-and-tobago/">Tajikistan vs Trinidad and Tobago: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,928 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.