Panama vs Zimbabwe: Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC

Panama
1.1 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
1.15 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama rank
115th
Zimbabwe rank
113th

Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Panama
  • Zimbabwe
00.250.50.7511.2196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 1.15 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 1.1 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Panama, a difference of 0.05 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Panama ahead.

Panama ranks 115th and Zimbabwe ranks 113th of 141 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 6 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5537 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0351 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.5186 1000 SLC per square kilometre Panama
1970s 0.8341 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0382 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.7959 1000 SLC per square kilometre Panama
1980s 0.9991 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0431 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.956 1000 SLC per square kilometre Panama
1990s 0.8198 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.057 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.7628 1000 SLC per square kilometre Panama
2000s 1.07 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.2667 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.7989 1000 SLC per square kilometre Panama
2010s 0.8138 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.9096 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0959 1000 SLC per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 1.12 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.09 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.03 1000 SLC per square kilometre Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Panama or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 1.15 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 1.1 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Panama as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Panama and Zimbabwe?
0.05 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Zimbabwe?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Panama and Zimbabwe rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Panama ranks 115th and Zimbabwe ranks 113th of 141 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Panama vs Zimbabwe: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/panama/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/panama/zimbabwe/">Panama vs Zimbabwe: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,928 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.